Skip to main content

Korg Minilogue

I bought the Korg Minilogue as a present to myself. I quit drinking in 2015. It’s not like I was falling down drunk everyday, but I had reached a point where even a few beers were giving me hangovers and interfering with things like meditation and general life satisfaction. To give myself something to aim for, I promised myself a six-month present and a one-year present. After six months I was the proud owner of a Volca FM (which I later sold) and for being booze-free for a year I rewarded myself with the Minilogue. OK, so actually I bought it at around the nine month mark when I knew I was in the clear. But it continued to function as an incentive since I knew that if I succumbed and had a beer I’d have to sell it and take a loss, and I didn’t want that.

It’s been almost two years now. I still have the Minilogue but oddly enough I’m only just now finding a niche for it in my studio.

People complain that the Minilogue is tinny and metallic sounding. They hate the clicky envelopes. They bemoan the lack of complex modulation. To this I say: it costs $500. It’s never going to be your perfect all-around synth, like maybe the Prophet-6 would be. I don’t see the point in complaining that it’s something that it was never meant to be. You don’t go see a historical drama and then complain that there aren’t enough lightsabers. You don’t go out for Thai and grumble that your pad see ew doesn’t taste like a hamburger. So why expect the Minilogue to sound like a different synth?

For me, the issue of working it into my music wasn’t that I didn’t like it, it was that I hadn’t settled on how best to use it. Whenever I played with it on its own, I enjoyed it immensely. I liked programming it, and found it it could do quite a variety of sounds, and well. I loved the delay, from which I could get eerie sci-fi sounds and some nice motion. And I liked the sound-shaping options in the oscillator section. But when working on a new song, I would always ignore the Minilogue in favor of some other machine. For bass and leads I went straight to the MS-20 Mini. For strings and pads I fired up the Roland HS-80 or Korg DW-8000. For effects or that melancholy touch I woke up the Technics SY-1010. And so on. But never the Minilogue. I even moved it right next to the computer and my mother keyboard so it was in easy tweaking range, hoping that would inspire me to work it into a tune. But the poor thing remained largely unused.

Recently I was working on a cover of the theme to Escape From New York. I was building it up layer by layer but had left the main lead for last. I tried different sounds but was having trouble fitting it into the mix, which had become pretty full by this point. I had HS-80 strings and drones, DW-8000 pads, bass from both the Yamaha TX81z and Roland JU-06. I even had an acid line courtesy the CS-01 (with Korg SQ-1 handling midi to CV duties).


And then I reached for the Minilogue. I crafted a lead sound that was full yet not overpowering and made use of the waveform shaping capabilities to give it some bite to differentiate it from the rest of the mix. I tell you, that sound just soared over everything else. Happy, I continued to stack up more sounds and all the while, that Minilogue lead held its own.

It continued to stand out in the mixing stage. Mixing down a song made almost entirely with one kind of sound is really hard. I love the sound of analog, don’t get me wrong. My synth tastes lean towards ‘70s mono synths and ‘80s poly synths. They just tickle my soul. But get 10 or so lanes of soft analog all chugging along and it can turn into a kind of warm mush. It’s why I don’t mind the occasional FM sound in there. It jumps out.

Can you imagine an artist only painting with shades of brown? Unless you’re Rothko, it’s hard to get a lot of definition and differentiation out of a limited palate of colors, fond though you may be of it. A while back I was in the market for a new mono synth. I tried all kinds but was particularly interested in the Arturia Brute series, primarily because of the size and price. I spent some time with one at a music store, putting it through its paces and seeing what it could do. I liked everything about it except the sound. It was too, well, brown. It reminded me of mains hum. And I just couldn’t envision that sound working within my already murky palette.

But not the Minilogue. It’s precisely because it’s a little metallic that it’s able to slice through the analog butter and make itself heard. In the mixing stage, I barely even had to touch it to make it stand out. In fact, I kept having to turn it down because it was almost a little too overzealous in its role as lead.

This is how the Minilogue will enter my workflow. It is the knife that cuts the butter. It is the rainbow on the oil slick. It is the northern lights in a dark sky. It is not an all-purpose synth. It’s the finisher, the Victor the Cleaner of polys. And I’m glad it sits pride of place next to my computer because from now on, whenever I need a confident sound, I’m going to call on the Minilogue. And may I never touch a drop of booze again.

Comments

  1. Yes. I have similar experiences with my Minilogue. Nice read.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Roland HS-80 SynthPlus 80 (Alpha Juno 2)

Although I listened to industrial music all through high school, and loved groups like Front 242 and Skinny Puppy, my interest in electronic music really exploded when I discovered techno and rave in 1991. I loved the energy of it but mostly I loved the sounds. It was unabashedly synthy, and each song was seemingly built around one or two incredible sounds that just repeated. It was glorious. I loved all the hoovers, but especially the Dominator, so if you had put money down with a bookie in 1991 that I’d someday be the proud owner of an Alpha Juno synth then you’d be a winner today. Well, almost. Instead of buying a reasonably sized Alpha Juno or Alpha Juno 2, I had to go and get the HS-80 SynthPlus 80, the rather unwieldy and, it has to be said, ugly home version. Introduced in 1987, a year later than the original Alphas, this behemoth widened the case to include an amp and two speakers. Gone are the fetching membrane buttons, replaced with D-50-style black push-button jobbi...

Korg Poly-61

Sometimes, for whatever reason, a synth will stay off your radar. It could have nothing to do with the sound of the synth itself. Maybe it’s even (in the parlance of our times) a beast. But for whatever reason you haven’t given it the time of day. This was my history with the Poly-61, Korg’s 1982 polysynth. Sandwiched between the famous and desirable Polysix, and the Poly-800, the synth that everyone loves to hate, the Poly-61 is easily forgotten. Nobody really talks about it, despite it having been used by big names of electronic music like Boards Of Canada and Com Truise. It also looks incredibly synthwave with its gray color scheme and grid-patterned front panel. I’ve been through more Poly-800s than I care to count, I have the Polysix iPad app, and I certainly wouldn’t mind a Mono/Poly, but a Poly-61? I must not be the only person with a blind spot for the 61 because I managed to get one recently in decent shape for $150. And pleased as punch I am. It’s a 6-voice dual DCO ana...

Korg Delta DL-50 Strings Synthesizer

I do love a good stringer. Ive worked on a Yamaha SK20 and a Roland RS-09 and RS-101 . This time it’s a Korg Delta DL-50 Strings Synthesizer, a lovely machine from 1979. It came out as part of Korg’s series of three Greek letter-named polyphonic machines. There was the Sigma and Lambda, both of which were largely preset machines, and then the Delta, which arguably offered the most control (until the Trident came out in 1980 and blew it out of the water). The Delta is fully polyphonic, no mean feat then or now. Before you get too excited though, it’s basically just a glorified organ. It uses three divide-down oscillators to create all the notes (plus one more for high C). So yes, you can hold down all the keys at the same time but you’re limited to a square wave. A very nice square wave, it should be noted, but just that one waveform nonetheless. The sound is further divided into synth and string sections, the former of which is pushed through a variable filter (low or bandpass), ...